torts
TORTS
1. IN TORT, in case of defamation ,
interntion to defame is not necessary, IPC defamation needs intention
2. Gloucester grammar school case is for DAMNUM SINE INJURIA
3. ASHBY V WHITE is case of INJURIA
SINE DAMNUM AC
4. Pigeon hole theory is by SALMOND
5. RULE FO STRICT LIABILITY IS IN CASE
RYLANDS VS FLETCHER
6. RULE FOR ABSOLUTE LIABILITY IS IN
CASE OF SRIRAM FERTILIZER = OLEUM GAS LEAK CASE
7. RES IPSA LOQUITOR is the thing
speaks for itself
8. Rule of last opportunity was laid
down in DAVIES V MANN CASE . Before killing when the assailant had the last
chance to stop his attack and not kill the victim and did he avail of this
opportunity or not
9. TYPE OF DAMAGES AWARDED IN TORTS ARE
UNLIQUIDATED DAMAGES , WHILE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES ARE AWARDED IN CONTRACTS
10. SALMOND Differentiated between
liquidated and unliquidated damages
11. Defamation, negligence, and public
nuisance ARE EXAMPLES OF BOTH TORT AND CRIME, CULPABLE HOMICIDE IN ONLY A CRIME
AND NOT A TORT.
INNUENDO ARE WORDS WHICH APPEAR INNOCENT BUT HAVE A DEFAMATORY MEANING HIDDEN
UNLIQUIDATED DAMAGES MEAN DAMAGE TO BE ASSESSED BY COURT
ASSAULT AND NUISANCE ARE WRONG UNDER TORT AND CRIMINAL LAW
BATTERY IS ACTUAL OR INTENDED STRIKING OF ANOTHER
VICARIOUS LIABILITY IS MASTER LIABLE FOR SERVANT WRING ACT
TRESSPASS IS UNLAWFUL ENTRY INTO ANOTHER PROPERTY
NO FAULT LIABILITY IS ABSOLUTE LIABILITY WITHOUT FAULT
RAMESH WANTS HIS SERVANT TO SELL HIM CYCLE AT LESSER PRICE WHICH IS UNDUE INFLUENCE
TORT LIABILITY ARISES FROM BREACH OF DUTY FIXED BY LAW , REDRESSABLE BY UNLIQUIDATED DAMAGES SAID WINFIELD
TORT OF NEGLIGENCE NEED NOT PROVE BREACH OF DUTY OWED TO SOMEONE
TORT IS GROUNDED IN THE CONCEPT OF RIGHTS
TORT DID NOT CAUSE INJURY IS NOT ELEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL TORT
CRIME OF BATTERY V TORT OF BATTERY IS UNWANTED TOUCH AS WE HAVE RIGHT NOT TO BE TOUCHED WITHOUT CONSENT
JOY HUNTS ON RAM LAND WITHOUT PERMISSION IS TRESSPASS
LOUD SOUND FROM NEIGHBOUR FLAT IS NUISANCE
FALSE STTMT IS DEFAMATION
FALSE CHARGE OF THEFT IS SLANDER
NEGLIGENCE INVOLVES CARELESSNESS
NEGLIGENCE TORT IS MOST FREQUENT
RASONABLE MAN STANDARD IS USED BECAUSE BREACH OF DUTY OCCURS WHEN REASONABLE MAN FAIOS TO OBSERVE DUE CARE IN DOING IT.
DAMNUM SINE INJURIA GLOUCESTER GRAMMER SCHOOL
INURIA SINE DAMNUM ASHBY V WHITE
COMPENSATION IS UNLIQUIDATED DAMAGES
TORT LATIN TORTUM =TWISTED
LAW OF TORT BY SALMOND = PIGEON HOLE THEORY
INDUCEMENT TO BREACH IN LUMLEY V GYE CASE
DECEIT IN CASE PASLEY V FREEMAN
STRICT LIABILITY RYLAND V FLETCHER CASE
PRIVITY OF CONTRACT CASE DONOGGUE V STEVENSON
ABSOLUTE LIABILITY IN AC MEHTA V UOI CASE
LOSS OF COMMERCIAL PROFIT NOT PROTECTED BY TORTS
ACTIONABLE PER SE IS ACTION BY COURT WITHOUT PROOF OF DAMAGE
CONTRACT IS TWO PARTIES TORT CAN BE ONE TO MANY AND LIQUIDATED VS UNLIQUIDATED DAMAGES
PRIMARY FUNCTION OF TORT IS COMPENSATE LOSER
IN NEGLIGENCE NO NEED TO HAVE MALICIOUS INTENT
DUTY OF CARE IN NEGLIGENCE RESTRICTS LIST OF WRONDOERS
Comments
Post a Comment