CPC RULES ORDERS
- MISJOINDER OF PARTIES AND MISJOINDER OF CAUSES OF ACTION IS CALLED MULTIFARIOUSNESS IN A SUIT ORDER 1 RULE 1.3
- ORDER 1 RULE 6B LOCAL AMENDMENT FO MP WHICH IS IMPORATNT PARTIES TO SUIT STATE GOVT OF MP
- ONE PARSON MAY SURE AND DEFEND ALL IN SAME INTEREST ORDER 1 RULE 8 IT IS CALLED REPRESENTATIVE SUIT
- REPRESENTATIVE SUIT ORDER 1 RULE 8
- A SUIT IN REPRESENTATIVE CAPACICAN BE FILED BY VIRTUE OF ABOVE ORDER 1 RULE 8
- PERSONS MORE INTERST ONE IN REPRESENTATIVE SUIT
- SUIT BY REP CAPACITY SUIT CAN BE WITHDRAWN ABANDONED COMPROMISED BY PLAINBT IFF AFTER NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
- ON WHICH OF THE GROUNDS A SUIT MAY BE DEFEATED BY NON JOINDER OF NECESSARY PARTIES ORDER 1 RULE 9
- NON JOINDER OF NECESSARY PARTIES ORDER 1 RULE 9 IT IS DISMISSED
- WHEN UNNECESSARY PARTIES ARE JOINED AS PARTIES TO THE SUIT IT IS CALLED MIS JOINDER ORDER 1 RULE 9
- THE DOCTRINE OF DOMINUS LITIS[ THE PERSON TO WHOM THE SUIT BELONGS ] IS ACCEPTABLE IN CPC BUT WITH EXCEPTION UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10.2
- AN OBJECTION AS TO NON JOINDER AND MINSJOINDER WHEN RAISED AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE OPPORTUNITY , AND ALSO AT THE SETTLE MENT , BEFORE SETTLEMENTN OS ISSUES ORDER 1 RULE 13
- ORDER ONE TO TEM MOST IMPORTANT
- ALL MATTERS IN DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES RELATING TO THE SAME TRANSACTION SHOULD BE DISPOSED OF IN THE SAME SUIT. THIS IS LAID DOWN IN ORDER 2 RULE 1
- RAM WAS DISPOSSESSED FROM HIS HOUSE BY SHYAM FOR A YEAR. RAM FILES A SUIT FOR POSSESSION AGSINT BUT DID NNOT INCLUDE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES IN IT. FOR CLAIMEING DAMAGES RAM COULD NOT FILE A NEW SUIT ORDER 2 RULE 2 A IS DUE AND UNPAID. A SUIES N IN 2018 ONLY FOR THE RENT DUE FOR YEAR 2016. WGHETHER A CAN AFTER WARDS SUE FOR THE RENT DUE TO THE YEAR OF 32015 AND 2017. NO AS PER ORDER ND 1
- A LETS A SHOUSE TO B AT AYEARLY RENT OF 123000 , THE RENT FOR HWHOEL OF YEAR 0151617 BUT HE DID NOT FILE SUIT FOR RENT OF 15 17, HE CANNOT DO SO LATER ORDER 2 RULE
- WHICH PROVISION OF THE CODE DELS WITH JOINDER OF CAUSES OF ACTION ORDER 2 RULE 3
- A PLAINTIFF CAN UNITE SEVERAL CAUSES OF ACCTION IN THE SAME SUIT AGAINST THE SAME DEFENDANT ORDER 2 RULE 3
- WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING DEALS WITH SERVICE OF PROCESS ON THE PLEASDER IN TWO, CPC ORDER 3 RULE 5
- IT IS A STATEMENT OF CLAIM A DOCUMENT BY PRESENTATION FO WHICH THE SUIT IS INSTITUTTED . IT IS CALLED AS PLAINT ORDER 4 RULE , NO OF COPIES ARE SEC 26 , COPIES ARE TEN
- PLAINST IS GIVEN IN ORDER 7
- PLAINT IN DUPLICATE TO COURT ODER 4 TULE 1
- ORDER 4 RULE 1 SUB RULE 1 A SUIT IS INSTITUTED WHEN A PAONT IN DUPLKICATE IS PRESENTED TO THE COURT
- A PLAINT HAS TO BE PRESENTD IN DULOICATE
- ORDER 5 CPC PROVIDES FOR ISSUE AND SERVICE OF SUMMONS
- ORDER 5 RULE 1 A DEFENDANT IS REQUIRED TO FILE THE WRITTEN STATEMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM SERVICE OF SUMMONS
- WHER A SUIT HAS BEEN DULY INSTITUTE D A SUMMONS MAY BE ISSUED TO THE DEFENDANT TO APPEAR AND ANSWER THE CLAIM AND MAY BE SERVEDD ON SUCH DAY NOT BEYOND 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF INSTITUTION OF SUIT ORDER 5RULE 1
- ORDER 5 RULE 1.1 IS REQUIRED TO APPEAR ANSWER AND FILE WRITTEN STATEMENT IS 30 DAYUS
- COPY OF PLAINST SHALL BE ATTACHED WITH EVERY SUMMON ORDER 5 RUOE 2
- NO ONE SHALL BE ORDERED TO ATTEND TH COURT IN PEON O GIVE EVIDENCE UNLESS HE RESIDES WITHIN 50 KM RADIUS ORDER 5 RULE 4
- EXPENSES FOR THE SERVICE OF SUMMON TO DEFENDANT HAE TO BE B ORNE BY PLAINTIFF, ORDER 5 RULE 9.3
- THE EXPENSES FOR THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS TO THE DEFENDANT HAVE TO BE BORNE UNDER ORDER 5 TULE 9.3 BY THE PLAINTIFF
- DASTI SUMMONS FOR SERVICE ON THE DEFENDANT CAN BE GIVEN TO THE OAINTIFF UDER ORDE 5 RULE 9A
- CPC AMENDED 2002
- 9A ORDER 5 IS CALLED DASTI SUMMONS
- WHICH OF INCORRECT: SERVICE OF SUMMONS SHALL BE MADE BY TENDERING A COPY THEROF SIGNED BY THE JUDGE ; EVERY DEFENDANT SHALL BER SERVED ON E SUMONS, SERVANT CANNOT ACCEPT SUMMONS, AGAENT CAN RECEIVE ODER 5 RULE 10
- WHEN THE SEVICE OF SUMONS TO THE DEFENDANT IS NOT MADE TO HIM DUE TO HIS ABASENCE WITHIN EASONBALE TIME, SUMONS CAN B SEBE SERVED TO THE ADULLT SON OF THE DEFENDANT ORDER 5 RULE 15
- DURING SERVICE OS SUMMONS DEFENDANT WAS FOUND ABSENT FROM HIS RESIDENCE WAND WITGIN REASONABLE TIME NNO CHANCE TO GET CBACK AT HIS RESIDENCE, SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS MAY BE MADE ON ADULT SON ORDER 5 RULE 15
- WHERE IN A SUIT THE DEFENDAT IS ABSNET FRO HIS RESIENE AND THER IS NO LIKELHOOD OF HIS BEING FOUNDAT THE RESIDENCE WITHIN A REASONBAL TIME SERVCIE OF SUMMON S AMY B MADE ON ADULT DAUGHTER ORDER 5 RULE 15
- SUBSTITUTED SERVICE SI PROVIDED UNDER ORDER 5 RULE 20
- PROVISION FOR SUBSTITUTED SERVICE OF SUMONS ON THE DEENDANTS HAS BEEN MADE UNDER ORDER 5 RULE 20
- WHERRE THE DEFENDANT IS CONFINED TO A PRISON
Comments
Post a Comment